Pittsburgh City Controller Michael Lamb is “putting up a warning flag” about the city’s use of piggyback contracts, he said as his office released an audit of city purchasing on Thursday.
Lamb made clear that his office’s audit, which looked into practices in the Office of Management and Budget’s [OMB] Bureau of Procurement, did not find any fraud or corruption but said the city’s current practices with piggyback contracts are troubling.
Piggyback contracts, also referred to as cooperative contracts, are deals struck for goods or services that were negotiated by one government or agency and used by another government or agency without a separate public bid.
“We just see the opportunity for some waste and some abuse,” Lamb told reporters at a press conference Thursday. The audit covered the years 2016 through 2018.
Lamb pointed to the city’s contract with Axon Enterprises, which supplies city police officers with body cameras. PublicSource previously reported that a police commander involved in the deal had financial ties to the company. Lamb said those types of arrangements between “salesmen” and city employees can be problematic.
Salesmen provide “an attractive sales pitch to government employees who are overwhelmed and have a lot going on,” he said. “So we want to make sure we’re not falling into that trap.”
Despite concerns raised in the audit, Lamb praised OMB for its efforts to improve contracting practices in the city.
In a response letter to Lamb’s audit, OMB Acting Director Jennifer Olzinger sought to clarify several points. She wrote that OMB seeks three bids before using a piggyback contract through the Pennsylvania Costars system — an online portal for public agencies to find and use piggyback contracts. City spokesperson Timothy McNulty said in an email Thursday that neither OMB nor the mayor’s office would comment beyond Olzinger’s letter.
[documentcloud url=”http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5995384-City-of-Pittsburgh-Controller-Audit-on-Piggyback.html” responsive=true]
Lamb’s Thursday audit came a day after Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner released a similar audit that also raised concerns about piggyback contracting. The county’s director of administrative services disputed parts of that audit.
Another sticking point between Lamb and Olzinger was whether or not to release the documents that show how the city decided to award a contract to a company.
Currently, the public is allowed to see the bid documents and the final contracts the city enters into, but residents can’t see the list of employees who chose which company to contract with or the disclosure forms for those employees. Additionally, the public can’t see the score cards used to make contracting decisions. Olzinger wrote that those documents aren’t allowed to be released to the public under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law [RTKL].
“Pittsburgh’s RTKL currently prohibits the posting of ‘internal deliberation materials’ of which scorecards and committee lists are considered to fall under,” she wrote.
Lamb said her characterization was “just inaccurate,” adding that because the RTKL allows the city to withhold those documents doesn’t mean it’s banned from releasing them.
“When you look at a contract on the city’s website, we should be able to see how the decision was made to award that contract,” he said.
Olzinger also wrote in her response letter that OMB is working to replace its Scout website — a portal for the public to view active city contracts — with a new site. Lamb said he believes the new site will make it more transparent. Olzinger wrote that OMB hopes to roll out the new site by the end of June.
Lamb’s audit said it was difficult for auditors to figure out if the city was saving or losing money on piggyback contracts.
“Given the variety and number of cooperative agreements the city has access to, it is difficult to retroactively determine if pricing was the lowest offered,” the audit found.
Lamb’s audit recommends that OMB “encourage and assist City departments” in figuring out if contracts through piggybacking or public bid would offer the lowest price. He said purchasers should compare at least three different contracts to do that.
Despite the limitations, Lamb’s auditors were able to do some price comparisons, particularly with the city’s piggybacked contract for Amazon goods. In total, the city spent $115,642 on items ordered from Amazon in 2018. The auditors took a sample of those purchases and compared the prices to other vendors and found that, generally, using Amazon gave the city better deals. The same held true when the auditors compared prices at Staples, where the city buys much of its office supplies, to prices from Amazon.
However, when the auditors compared Amazon prices to Grainger, an industrial supply company the city uses to buy hoses, water pumps and other equipment, they found that Amazon had higher prices. Home Depot, they found, had lower prices than Grainger in some instances.
“This again supports the need for purchasers to ‘shop around’ for prices,” the audit said.
Lamb said that because the study of piggyback contracts was limited, it’s hard to say definitively whether or not they’re beneficial.
“From our limited test, we can’t say we’re getting beat on price by piggybacking, but we can’t say we’re getting the best price,” he said.
Lamb also posed questions about the city’s use of purchasing cards, or p-cards, which are like credit cards city employees can use to purchase small amounts of goods that the city doesn’t have under contract or needs in an emergency.
Lamb recommended that OMB educate employees on proper use of the cards and noted that the city should enter into contracts for goods instead of relying on using the p-cards.
The audit also recommended that OMB require city employees to keep better track of documents related to p-card purchases so that the controller’s office can better monitor that they’re being used appropriately. Olzinger responded by saying that city council, not the city controller, has authority to halt payments on the p-cards if a charge doesn’t follow the rules.
Lamb said the city needs to keep its focus on buying local and that using piggyback contracts can impede that.
“If you’re not diligent about a local process, sooner or later you’re going to get beat on price,” he said. “I think we owe it people to make sure we’re getting best price and the only way to test that is to do some kind of local bid. And we owe it to people to give our local vendors a shot.”
J. Dale Shoemaker is PublicSource’s government and data reporter. You can reach him at 412-515-0060 or by email at email@example.com. You can follow him on Twitter at @JDale_Shoemaker. He can be reached securely via PGP: bit.ly/2ig07qL
This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.
James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.
It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?