A Senate plan for prison reform was announced Thursday by unusual bipartisan allies.
If passed — and it’s a big if — the bill would allow judges more discretion in handing out sentences for some drug crimes and put greater emphasis on reentry efforts for inmates already serving time.
Reform advocates complain that the justice system is sending inmates to expensive and overcrowded prisons to serve long terms without improving public safety. Opponents fear more lenient sentencing will speed the return of unreformed criminals back to the community.
Among reform supporters is Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), previously a big obstacle in the fight to reduce mandatory minimum sentences.
From the National Journal:
“The myth is that there are thousands of low-level drug offenders, like people smoking marijuana, in federal prison for long terms. This is supposed to mean a waste of federal tax dollars, overcrowding, and unfairness to people who should not be in prison,” Grassley said on the floor. “These myths are often used to justify lenient and, frankly, dangerous sentencing proposals in this body. One of those proposals is the so-called Smarter Sentencing Act.”
Donors and constituents wanted action, the story said. That included the Koch brothers — major funders of conservative causes and vocal proponents of prison reform.
After negotiations, Grassley was satisfied that the Senate plan wouldn’t lead to an across-the-board cut in sentences, especially for more serious drug offenders, which is still a major concern of his.
On Saturday, the Des Moines Register ran an op-ed from Grassley on the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015, the bill he introduced with Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).
His column starts by invoking Moses and Pope Francis and how justice systems have evolved from Hammurabi’s code of an “eye for an eye” to the 21st century.
“There’s no doubt that drug and human trafficking and gang-related crimes continue to persist and poison the well of civic life, endangering public safety daily…” Grassley’s column said. “The right policy mix of reforms can give low-level offenders who have paid their debts to society a second chance to rejoin their families and find employment in their communities.”
Grassley’s support does not guarantee the plan gets passed or even put up to a vote.
For one thing, Congress has not been quick to act on anything, and regardless of action in the Senate, any reform plan will need House support.
From the Los Angeles Times:
Yet even though the measure is seen as the most hopeful in the House at this point, it has yet to be given a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, where the chairman, Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.), has been given the go-ahead by the House GOP leadership to develop his own plan.
One Capitol Hill source said sentencing changes may not make it out of the House until next year, if then, and then it would have to be reconciled with various Senate versions under discussion, including the latest proposal.
While prison reform has vocal bipartisan supporters, campaign season doesn’t typically benefit compromise. Thursday’s announcement was years in the making.
Reach Jeffrey Benzing at 412-315-0265 or at firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow him on Twitter @jabenzing.
This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.
James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.
It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?