During arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, the justices cast doubt on the legality of states using independent commissions to draw their congressional district boundaries, according to Bloomberg.

At issue is Arizona’s independent redistricting commission that completely removes the state legislature from the process. The commission was created by voters in a 2000 ballot initiative. California has also completely removed the legislature from its redistricting process.

The one-hour argument suggested that at least the Arizona and California systems are now in legal jeopardy. The session focused on the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the rules governing congressional elections are to be set by “the legislature thereof.”

Part of the question posed to the Supreme Court is the meaning of the word legislature and whether that means, strictly, the state’s lawmaking bodies or more generally means the lawmaking process.

Justice Anthony Kennedy pointed to a since-amended provision of the Constitution that said U.S. senators from each state would be chosen by its “legislature.” He said the debate over that provision, which was superseded in 1913 when the 17th Amendment provided for direct election of senators, never suggested that the “legislature” would encompass a ballot initiative.

There are a variety of ways that a state can draw its congressional districts. As you can see in this Washington Post graphic adapted from Reddit, drawing representative districts, compact districts and gerrymandered districts can all result in different outcomes.

Some state legislatures have created congressional districts with spider-like legs, such as Pennsylvania’s 7th Congressional District which is northwest of Philadelphia. It is one of the most gerrymandered congressional districts in the country.

Independent commissions are one alternative to the partisan redistricting process than can result from state legislatures. Another comes from a programmer who created an algorithm that only draws the most compact districts.

To learn more about redistricting, you can play the University of Southern California’s educational redistricting game. You can see what it’s like to draw district lines with partisan and non-partisan motivations.

Reach Eric Holmberg at 412-315-0266 or at eholmberg@publicsource.org. Follow him on Twitter @holmberges.

This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.

James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.

It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?