A proposal to use zoning laws to spur more affordable housing creation is in question again with Pittsburgh City Council voting by a slim majority on an altered inclusionary zoning bill that removes mandatory low-income requirements. 

Wednesday’s council meeting, accompanied by obscenity-filled asides, was the latest phase of more than a year of efforts and counterefforts to alter Pittsburgh’s housing zoning policies in an increasingly dizzying merry-go-round. 

At the center of the merry-go-round are the office of outgoing Mayor Ed Gainey, pushing for low-income housing mandates across the city, a divided City Council and the City Planning Commission. 

Council voted 5-4 to amend Gainey’s inclusionary zoning legislation, removing a requirement that any development with more than 20 housing units must include at least two affordable units. Councilor Erika Strassburger proposed the amendment removing that requirement, instead providing developers with a choice to include affordable housing in new developments, using subsidies as an incentive. 

“We’ve been speaking about this for a long time, discussing major housing reforms practically nonstop for over a year,” Strassburger said. “My stance hasn’t changed, I’m willing to work with anyone to craft a comprehensive housing policy that will increase affordability and housing access.”

Strassburger called her amendment a compromise and said she would support “an inclusionary zoning policy that increases the supply of housing units without discouraging construction of residential production.”

Many members of the public who showed up voiced opposition to Strassburger’s amendment. 

“Inclusionary zoning cannot be optional, it must be mandatory,” Teaira Collins of Greenfield told council. “The city is prejudiced. You don’t want me living next door to you but you’re fine with pushing me out of the city. Stop saying you’re doing something for us and start doing it.”

The zoning overlay is currently in place in Lawrenceville, Bloomfield, Polish Hill and the majority of Oakland, but is also the subject of a lawsuit filed by the Builders Association of Metropolitan Pittsburgh, which opposes the rules. 

In September 2024, Gainey announced  plans to spread inclusionary zoning beyond its current borders. City Councilor Bob Charland drew up an alternative zoning bill. In January, during an 11-hour meeting, the City Planning Commission recommended for Gainey’s version and against Charland’s, sending the matter to council. With the swing coming full circle, council is now sending the issue back to the commission, this time to weigh in on the amended zoning expansion. 

In a statement released after council’s vote, Gainey said Strassburger’s amendment “radically expands public subsidy to private developers, while including loopholes that allow them to walk away from actually providing affordable housing.”

During the meeting, dozens of residents and activists voiced support for mandatory inclusionary zoning, while a handful backed Strassburger’s amendment to make the affordable housing requirements voluntary. 

“I’m about jobs, construction,” said Steve Mazza, a resident of Sheraden and a member of the Planning Commission. 

Mazza said that as a union guy he worries that having mandatory inclusionary zoning would depress union construction jobs and lead to a general slump in the economy. As an alternative to zoning reform, Mazza said there are thousands of vacant properties in the city that can be used to create more housing opportunities. 

“We can turn those properties around and keep them out of the hands of speculators,” Mazza said. “To force everyone to do [affordable units] is going about it the wrong way. We don’t need to keep fighting about this.”

Other residents warned that voting for Strassburger’s amendment would lead to the city further gentrifying while others threatened to vote against council members if they supported the amendment. 

The planning commission can now take up the amended zoning legislation and either give a positive or negative recommendation. 

Eric Jankiewicz is PublicSource’s economic development reporter and can be reached at ericj@publicsource.org or on Twitter @ericjankiewicz.

Close window

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this Pittsburgh's Public Source story in full online or in print under the conditions stated below. You may also choose to republish the first 12 paragraphs with imagery and link to PublicSource for the full story. All you need to do is copy the HTML code we provide on this page and paste it into your CMS. We strongly encourage you to copy the code and paste it directly into a code editor. In Wordpress, press the three dots in the upper right of the Post and choose Code editor. That should give you the story text, along with photos from the body of the article. Here are your obligations under our republishing guidelines:

• Give us credit, in this format: “by [Author Name(s)], Pittsburgh's Public Source”.
• Include a line at the top of the story that reads: “Pittsburgh's Public Source is an independent nonprofit newsroom serving the Pittsburgh region. Sign up for our free newsletters.”
• In the html code of the page, include a line of javascript that helps us keep track of hits. It’s already in the code below.

Let us know when you use our work by sending an email to ds@publicsource.org. By republishing our story, you agree to the following conditions:

• You can’t edit, cut or alter the story, except to suit your in-house style (e.g. % vs. “percent,” honorifics, etc).
• You must not resell the story or sell ads against the story. It’s fine to publish the story on a page that’s surrounded by previously sold ads, however.
• Please exclude our work from being published or syndicated to third-party platforms or apps like Newsbreak under your publication name, when possible

If you share the story or a link to the story on social media, please tag us on Twitter (@publicsourcepa), Instagram (@publicsource), Facebook (@publicsource) or TikTok (@publicsource). We reserve the right to deny, revoke or limit the rights conveyed herein for any reason, including (but not limited to) instances in which these conditions are not met or the reproduced material is not presented in a responsible manner.

Inclusionary zoning heading back to Pittsburgh commission after amendment squeaks through

by Eric Jankiewicz, Pittsburgh's Public Source
October 15, 2025

<h1>Inclusionary zoning heading back to Pittsburgh commission after amendment squeaks through</h1> <p class="byline">by Eric Jankiewicz, Pittsburgh's Public Source <br />October 15, 2025</p> <p>A proposal to use zoning laws to spur more affordable housing creation is in question again with Pittsburgh City Council voting by a slim majority on an altered inclusionary zoning bill that removes mandatory low-income requirements.&nbsp;</p> <p>Wednesday’s council meeting, accompanied by obscenity-filled asides, was the latest phase of more than a year of efforts and counterefforts to alter Pittsburgh’s housing zoning policies in an increasingly dizzying merry-go-round.&nbsp;</p> <p>At the center of the merry-go-round are the office of outgoing Mayor Ed Gainey, pushing for low-income housing mandates across the city, a divided City Council and the City Planning Commission.&nbsp;</p> <p>Council voted 5-4 to amend <a href="https://www.publicsource.org/inclusionary-zoning-pittsburgh-competing-proposals-gainey-charland-planning-commission/">Gainey’s inclusionary zoning legislation</a>, removing a requirement that any development with more than 20 housing units must include at least two affordable units. Councilor Erika Strassburger proposed the amendment removing that requirement, instead providing developers with a choice to include affordable housing in new developments, using subsidies as an incentive.&nbsp;</p> <p>“We’ve been speaking about this for a long time, discussing major housing reforms practically nonstop for over a year,” Strassburger said. “My stance hasn’t changed, I’m willing to work with anyone to craft a comprehensive housing policy that will increase affordability and housing access.”</p> <p>Strassburger called her amendment a compromise and said she would support “an inclusionary zoning policy that increases the supply of housing units without discouraging construction of residential production.”</p> <p>Many members of the public who showed up voiced opposition to Strassburger’s amendment.&nbsp;</p> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AJ_HousingAmendment-Jankiewicz-9.jpg" alt="A woman with gray hair speaks at a podium with microphones in a wood-paneled room." class="wp-image-1324950" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Danielle Graham-Robinson of Brighton Heights speaks against Pittsburgh City Councilor Erika Strassburger’s inclusionary zoning amendment on Oct. 15, at the City-County Building. Council voted to approve Strassburger’s amendment 5-4 after debate. (Alex Jurkuta/Pittsburgh’s Public Source)</figcaption></figure> <p>“Inclusionary zoning cannot be optional, it must be mandatory,” Teaira Collins of Greenfield told council. “The city is prejudiced. You don’t want me living next door to you but you’re fine with pushing me out of the city. Stop saying you’re doing something for us and start doing it.”</p> <p>The zoning overlay is <a href="https://www.publicsource.org/lawrenceville-inclusionary-zoning-gainey-pittsburgh-peduto-affordable-housing/">currently in place </a>in Lawrenceville, Bloomfield, Polish Hill and the majority of Oakland, but is also the subject of a lawsuit filed by the Builders Association of Metropolitan Pittsburgh, which opposes the rules.&nbsp;</p> <p>In September 2024, Gainey announced&nbsp; plans to spread inclusionary zoning beyond its current borders. City Councilor Bob Charland <a href="https://www.publicsource.org/inclusionary-zoning-pittsburgh-competing-proposals-gainey-charland-planning-commission/">drew up an alternative zoning bill</a>. In January, during <a href="https://www.publicsource.org/inclusionary-zoning-pittsburgh-city-planning-commission-votes-council-mayor-gainey/">an 11-hour meeting</a>, the City Planning Commission recommended for Gainey’s version and against Charland’s, sending the matter to council. With the swing coming full circle,&nbsp;council is now sending the issue back to the commission, this time to weigh in on the amended zoning expansion.&nbsp;</p> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/20250423-Pittsburgh-Mayor-Gainey-Affordable-Housing-Bus-Tour-14-1.jpg" alt="A man in a suit sits in a vehicle holding papers, looking out the window with sunlight illuminating his face." class="wp-image-1318022" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Mayor Ed Gainey reads documents as he gives a bus tour of affordable housing across Pittsburgh on April 23, in the East End.(Photo by Stephanie Strasburg/Pittsburgh's Public Source)</figcaption></figure> <p>In a statement released after council’s vote, Gainey said Strassburger’s amendment “radically expands public subsidy to private developers, while including loopholes that allow them to walk away from actually providing affordable housing.”</p> <p>During the meeting, dozens of residents and activists voiced support for mandatory inclusionary zoning, while a handful backed Strassburger's amendment to make the affordable housing requirements voluntary.&nbsp;</p> <div class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow aligncenter" data-autoplay="true" data-delay="4" data-effect="slide" style="--aspect-ratio:calc(683 / 1024)"> <div class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_container swiper"> <ul class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_swiper-wrapper swiper-wrapper"> <li class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_slide swiper-slide"> <figure><img alt="A woman in a gray t-shirt speaks at a podium with a sign that reads &quot;PLEASE TAKE ONE!&quot; in a formal indoor setting." class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_image wp-image-1324948" data-id="1324948" data-aspect-ratio="683 / 1024" src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AJ_HousingAmendment-Jankiewicz-2-683x1024.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_caption gallery-caption">Tanisha Long of Crafton Heights speaks against Pittsburgh City Councilor Erika Strassburger’s inclusionary zoning amendment. (Alex Jurkuta/Pittsburgh’s Public Source)</figcaption></figure> </li> <li class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_slide swiper-slide"> <figure><img alt="A woman in a blazer speaks into a microphone at a podium, holding papers, in a formal indoor setting." class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_image wp-image-1324945" data-id="1324945" data-aspect-ratio="683 / 1024" src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AJ_HousingAmendment-Jankiewicz-11-683x1024.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_caption gallery-caption">Hailey Phillips of Garfield speaks against the amendment. (Alex Jurkuta/Pittsburgh’s Public Source)</figcaption></figure> </li> <li class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_slide swiper-slide"> <figure><img alt="A man in a green polo shirt and glasses speaks at a podium in a formal indoor setting, with blue curtains and wooden details in the background." class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_image wp-image-1324944" data-id="1324944" data-aspect-ratio="683 / 1024" src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AJ_HousingAmendment-Jankiewicz-16-683x1024.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_caption gallery-caption">Jack Billings of Downtown speaks on behalf of Pro-Housing Pittsburgh, in favor of the amendment. (Alex Jurkuta/Pittsburgh’s Public Source)</figcaption></figure> </li> <li class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_slide swiper-slide"> <figure><img alt="A man speaks at a wooden podium with a microphone in a wood-paneled room, wearing a gray pullover with an American flag patch on the sleeve." class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_image wp-image-1324943" data-id="1324943" data-aspect-ratio="683 / 1024" src="https://www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/AJ_HousingAmendment-Jankiewicz-17-683x1024.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_caption gallery-caption">Steve Mazza of Sheraden speaks in favor of the amendment. (Alex Jurkuta/Pittsburgh’s Public Source)</figcaption></figure> </li> </ul> <p><a class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_button-prev swiper-button-prev swiper-button-white" role="button"></a><a class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_button-next swiper-button-next swiper-button-white" role="button"></a><a aria-label="Pause Slideshow" class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_button-pause" role="button"></a></p> <div class="wp-block-jetpack-slideshow_pagination swiper-pagination swiper-pagination-white"></div> </div> </div> <p>“I’m about jobs, construction,” said Steve Mazza, a resident of Sheraden and a member of the Planning Commission.&nbsp;</p> <p>Mazza said that as a union guy he worries that having mandatory inclusionary zoning would depress union construction jobs and lead to a general slump in the economy. As an alternative to zoning reform, Mazza said there are thousands of vacant properties in the city that can be used to create more housing opportunities.&nbsp;</p> <p>“We can turn those properties around and keep them out of the hands of speculators,” Mazza said. “To force everyone to do [affordable units] is going about it the wrong way. We don’t need to keep fighting about this.”</p> <p>Other residents warned that voting for Strassburger's amendment would lead to the city further gentrifying while others threatened to vote against council members if they supported the amendment.&nbsp;</p> <p>The planning commission can now take up the amended zoning legislation and either give a positive or negative recommendation.&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Eric Jankiewicz is PublicSource’s economic development reporter and can be reached at <a href="mailto:ericj@publicsource.org">ericj@publicsource.org</a> or on Twitter </em><a href="https://x.com/EricJankiewicz"><em>@ericjankiewicz</em></a><em>.</em></p> <p>This &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;https://www.publicsource.org/inclusionary-zoning-amendments-strassburger-gainey/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; first appeared on &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;https://www.publicsource.org&quot;&gt;Pittsburgh&#039;s Public Source&lt;/a&gt; and is republished here under a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/&quot;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;img src=&quot;https://i0.wp.com/www.publicsource.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cropped-ps_circle_favicon_blue.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;amp;ssl=1&quot; style=&quot;width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;&quot;&gt;</p> &lt;img id=&quot;republication-tracker-tool-source&quot; src=&quot;https://www.publicsource.org/?republication-pixel=true&amp;post=1324958&amp;amp;ga4=G-CCLXQK5C14&quot; style=&quot;width:1px;height:1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;script&gt; PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: &quot;https://www.publicsource.org/inclusionary-zoning-amendments-strassburger-gainey/&quot;, urlref: window.location.href }); } } &lt;/script&gt; &lt;script id=&quot;parsely-cfg&quot; src=&quot;//cdn.parsely.com/keys/publicsource.org/p.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;

Copy to Clipboard

1