Update April 28, 2015: In the midst of several National Football League scandals last October, PublicSource asked freelance writer Patrick Doyle to take a look at the nonprofit status of the league. On April 28, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the league will no longer be tax exempt, eliminating a ādistraction.ā
A list of Americaās best compensated CEOs, as you might imagine, includes a dream team of industry titans. According to Equilar, which collects data on executive salaries, Oracleās Larry Ellison pulled in $96.2 million of total compensation in 2012; heās followed by other bold-faced business names like Robert Iger of Walt Disney ($37.1 million), Rupert Murdoch of 21st Century Fox ($22.4 million), and Alan Mulally of Ford ($21 million).
Another member of that salary stratosphere is Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, who earned $44.2 million in total compensation in 2012.
The difference between Goodell and the rest, though, is that he runs a nonprofit. Thatās rightāthe National Football League is, in the eyes of the Internal Revenue Service, a nonprofit.
That tax-exempt status has never been more in danger, due to rising political and public anger at recent NFL scandals, including the Ray Rice domestic abuse case, the Adrian Peterson child abuse case, and the Washington Redskinsā refusal to change their name and mascot.
In Southwestern Pennsylvania, the Pittsburgh Steelers have received their own self-inflicted black eyes: Following allegations of sexual abuse in 2010, quarterback Ben Roethlisberger served a four-game suspension, while recently re-signed linebacker James Harrison was arrested on domestic abuse in 2008 (those charges were later dropped).
Over the past year, three U.S. Senators have proposed bills to strip the NFL of its tax exemption, while more than 400,000 people have signed a Change.org petition urging Congress to act.
āWe are subsidizing this institution that has been so incredibly obtuse about the issues of sexual violence,ā says Lawrence Lessig, the director of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University and the founder of Rootstrikers, a grassroots advocacy group that has campaigned against the exemption. āThe American public obviously likes sports and football, but when youāre in a clearly commercial context, when an enormous amount of money is being made, the idea that you would be subsidizing it is craziness.ā
A convenient loophole
To be clear: The entire NFL is not a nonprofit. Like many modern corporations, what we think of as āThe NFLā is an entity composed of various subsidies, including the for-profit NFL Network (the cable and satellite network owned by the league), as well as 32 separate teams. In 2012, āThe NFLā netted $9.5 billion in revenue through TV licensing, ticket sales and merchandise; the vast majority of that money is funneled through the leagueās teams. The teams are subsequently responsible for paying āduesā to the leagueās office, which manages rules, oversees referees and conducts āplayer safety research.ā The league office received $326 million in dues in 2012, the most recent year for which such data is available. Only the league office, run by Goodell, is considered a nonprofit.
Unlike public charities such the American Red Cross and the Salvation Army, which are considered 501(c)(3) nonprofits, the NFL is a 501(c)(6) organization, a segment of the tax code that applies to trade associations such as the American Medical Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and was created in 1942. These groups are afforded nonprofit status to support the ācommon interestā of the members of a particular industry. The AMA, for example, supports doctors across the country; the chamber advances collective business interests. Membership is supposed to be open to anyone who can meet some basic requirement, be it a medical degree or a real estate license.
Given that the NFL ātrade associationā is limited to just 32 teams, several experts told PublicSource that the league shouldnāt be considered a 501(c)(6) organization. Philip Hackney, an associate professor at the Law Center at Louisiana State University and a former attorney in the IRSās department of tax-exempt government entities, points to the seemingly similar situation in the 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision in National Muffler Dealers Assn. Inc. vs. United States. Muffler chain Midas tried to form a trade association of Midas dealers around the country to take advantage of the nonprofit tax breaks at the national office. The IRS denied the request, as did the Supreme Court, ruling that the associationās focus ā which was to promote Midas ā was far too narrow.
āIn my mind, the NFL doesnāt fit very well [into 501(c)(6) status]ā Hackney says. āThey do some good things with charity, but the majority of what they do is promote the brand of the NFL and the 32 teams.ā
Goodellās salary also seems to fail the IRS requirement that no nonprofit exists to benefit a certain individual. With his $44.2 million in compensation in 2012, Goodell took home a whopping 14 percent of the league officeās total revenue. Other top earners were executive vice president and general counsel Jeff Pash ($7.9 million) and executive vice president of business ventures Eric Grubman ($4.2 million); three others received compensation packages higher than $1.7 million.
Even among the other nonprofit leagues, the staggering NFL salaries stand out. For the sake of comparison, both National Hockey League Commissioner Gary Bettman and Professional Golf Association Tour commissioner Timothy Finchem each made $8.3 million. While the NBA has always been a nonprofit, Major League Baseball gave up its tax-exempt status in 2008 ā in part, some reports say, to avoid revealing information about high salaries to the public.
When PublicSource reached out to the Pittsburgh Steelers for a comment on the leagueās tax status, they referred us to the NFLās league office. Brian McCarthy, the NFLās vice president of communications, directed us to a 2013 U.S. News article written by Jeremy Spector, the leagueās outside tax counsel. In the piece, Spector points out that in 2009, the IRS confirmed the leagueās tax-exempt status, but fails to discuss either the NFLās ācommon interestā as a trade association, or Goodellās high salary.
āAsk yourself, why would a nonprofit anywhere ā the whole purpose of a nonprofit is to help people ā pay a CEO $44 million a year?ā says Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), a critic of the NFL tax breaks. āThat tells youāre not a nonprofit right there.ā
Time for a change?
In September 2013, Coburn introduced the Properly Reducing Overexemptions for Sports Act (PRO Sports Act), which would remove nonprofit status from any sports organization with more than $10 million in annual revenue, including the NFL, NHL, PGA Tour and the U.S. Tennis Association. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) has signed on to the bill, and U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz has introduced a version in the U.S. House.
According to Coburn, his proposed changes in the tax code would result in more than $109 million in new tax revenue over the next decade. āI donāt think pro sports teams are trade associations,ā Coburn said. āThey are companies that are promoting their own brand, their own teams, and their own league, and not sports in general. We need the tax revenue, and to stop giving it away to people who donāt need it.ā
Two other senators have also recently offered variations on the tax exemption revocation. In September, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) put forward a bill that would strip the NFL of its nonprofit status until the Washington Redskins changed their name; her bill has the support of Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). And following the Ray Rice scandal this autumn, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) proposed a bill that would use tax payments from the NFLās league office to ramp up investment in domestic violence prevention.
Outside of Congress, two grassroots campaigns are advocating for the removal of the tax exemption. Lessigās Rootstrikers, a nonprofit group that opposes the corrupting influence of money in politics, has started its own campaign in support of Coburnās legislation, while a petition on Change.org had gathered more than 400,000 signatures as of press time.
NFL as lobbyist
Source: The New York Times, Guidestar. Capitalist designed by Graeme Ford from the Noun Project.
The NFL has maintained its nonprofit status thanks, in part, to a sophisticated lobbying effort on both the local and national levels. According to Open Secrets, the NFL has spent nearly $3 million lobbying over the past three years, while a Sunlight Foundation report showed that NFL personnel ā owners, players and staff ā donated $1.5 million to candidates in the 2012 election.
As part of its effort to contain the PR crisis from the domestic abuse scandal, the league also recently hired Cynthia Hogan, a prominent Democratic operative and former counsel to Vice President Joe Biden. According to Politico, Hogan was the ākey Senate aideā behind the initial passage of the Violence Against Women Act in 1994.
āThe NFL is very active with lobbyists,ā says Gregg Easterbrook, a journalist and author of the 2013 book The King of Sports: Footballās Impact on America. āIn modern Washington, you donāt buy politicians off ā you give them campaign donations, you invite the local congressman to sit in the ownersā box and get them announced at the games. [They want people to think], āLook at the senator, sitting next to the owner! Look how important they are!āā
Coburn acknowledges the vested interest of his colleagues. āHow many different pro teams are there, and how many senators are from those states?ā he asks. NFL teams are located in 22 states, so there are 44 senators with a powerful entity at home. That āmakes it pretty hard to change something.ā
Still, the NFLās recent failures may push the league to finally act. Easterbrook says: āGiven all the PR problems that the NFL has ā we could spend all day listing them ā I find it puzzling that they wouldnāt say, in order to prove that they are concerned about what the public thinks, āWeāre asking Congress to revoke our nonprofit status.ā That would be great public relations.ā
When asked whether the NFL was considering dropping its tax-exempt status, the NFLās McCarthy declined to comment.
Coburn is hopeful that even if Congress wonāt take the right steps, the league might. āThis isnāt big money to the NFL,ā he says. āI hear they are thinking about getting out of it like MLB. It certainly doesnāt smell good or look good when you pay the head of the nonprofit $44 million a year. These guys donāt need this.ā
Patrick Doyle is a freelance writer and editor living in Pittsburgh. Reach him at patrickcdoyle.com.
