Derailment after derailment. They just keep happening.
Over the past several years, there have been numerous derailments in North America carrying crude from North Dakota’s Bakken Shale. These accidents have sparked increased calls from citizens, the rail industry and lawmakers for the federal government to increase safety regulations.
To keep up with these incidents and new safety regulations, PublicSource provides a roundup of stories every Friday.
Portland, Ore., opposes crude-by-rail transport
Officials in Multnomah County, which covers Portland, Oregon, passed a resolution to publicly note their opposition to shipping crude oil through a heavily populated area in the state. The resolution calls for a ban on crude-by-rail shipments as well as the construction of any projects that would increase the volume of crude oil in the county. KGW reports that this includes the construction of the Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy Distribution Terminal, which would be the largest transport facility in North America.
North Dakota officials permit crude oil pipeline
North Dakota regulators approved plans for Dakota Access to build its $3.8 billion, 1,168-mile pipeline in the Bakken oil field. Iowa is the last state the company needs to approve construction. Its regulators are supposed to make a decision in February, according to the Williston Herald. Dakota Access plans to ship 450,000 barrels a day.
Increased violations against rail, train companies
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued 6,485 violations in the last fiscal year, an increase of 23 percent, according to the Wall Street Journal. The FRA collected $15 million in civil penalties, its highest collection ever. The administration’s chief ordered a “zero-tolerance” policy for routes that carry crude oil and hazardous chemicals.
This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.
James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.
It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?