Since the “One Big Beautiful Bill” imposed new restrictions on SNAP enrollment last summer, some 19,000 in Allegheny County have dropped off the program. Most are working households struggling to make ends meet.
(Original photo by Stephanie Strasburg/Pittsburgh's Public Source)
Hunger does not happen in a vacuum. It is built, policy by policy, narrative by narrative, into a country that has turned the simple act of feeding your family into something to be ashamed of.
For decades, opponents of SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have shaped public discourse around who “deserves” help and who is “gaming the system.” That framing costs people access to life-saving food. Fear of judgment leads eligible people to delay or abandon their applications entirely. Deliberate confusion about who qualifies (be it immigrants, college students or working adults) keeps people in the dark about benefits they have every right to access.
According to the Food Resource and Action Center, since Congress passed the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” in July 2025, over 5 million individuals have lost access to SNAP. In Allegheny County alone, enrollment fell by 19,000, with many of those likely tied to new work requirements and additional paperwork hurdles buried in the bill. These are veterans, older adults, people with disabilities, your neighbors, your coworkers, your relatives, all losing their most effective defense against hunger.
Defenders of these cuts call the program bloated, say it breeds dependency, insist it needs to be reined in. Ignoring the data, they strategically flatten SNAP recipients into a single category, rather than recognizing a large, diverse group of people navigating poverty in an economy where food prices surged 23.5% between 2020 and 2023, where a full-time job no longer guarantees food security, and where 74% of SNAP households in Pennsylvania include at least one working adult.
This rhetoric also upholds a history of systemic racial inequality, which it continues to feed to this day. In Pennsylvania in 2024, Black residents experienced food insecurity at nearly three times the rate of white residents, 27% compared to 10%, and Hispanic and Latino residents face rates nearly as stark. Research from Johns Hopkins confirms that SNAP meaningfully narrows the gap in food insecurity between participating Black and white households. To cut SNAP is to exacerbate these disparities, and this is not accidental. The communities hit hardest are the same ones that have been the target of racist policy and rhetoric for generations.
Meanwhile, bureaucratic dysfunction provides convenient camouflage for what is a political choice. Nearly half of SNAP participants in Pennsylvania report not receiving paperwork with enough time to meet deadlines; three in 10 struggle to reach a caseworker by phone; and many face wait times of an hour or more just to speak with someone. Thousands of accounts are closed every month because the system is chronically understaffed and overwhelmed.
The fixes are not complicated.
Fund county assistance offices so that staff are not drowning.
Streamline documentation and extend certification periods so that a missed piece of mail does not mean going hungry.
Invest in multilingual outreach.
Treat applicants like people.
These are not radical demands. They are the baseline for a functioning program.
What stands between those fixes and reality is not a lack of solutions. It is a lack of political will, built on policy designed to judge whether people have earned the right to eat.
We can and should debate budget math and administrative bottlenecks, but we must be honest about what’s driving this moment. Hunger isn’t an accident of policy failure. For too many in power, it’s the intended result. Until we say that plainly, and demand better with real urgency, the cuts will keep coming and the food bank lines will keep growing.
Kellie Wild is executive director of the Pittsburgh Food Policy Council and can be reached at kellliew@pittsburghfoodpolicy.org. The Pittsburgh Food Policy Council is a nonprofit organization that mobilizes people through listening, educating and advocating for policies and programs that shift power, expand access to resources and strengthen the Greater Pittsburgh food system.
Heather Seiders is executive director of Just Harvest and can be reached at heathers@justharvest.org. Just Harvest is a nonprofit organization dedicated to addressing hunger and economic injustice in the Greater Pittsburgh region.
MORE STORIES
Help us continue telling stories like this one.
We’re Pittsburgh’s Public Source, an independent, nonprofit newsroom. That means we rely on donations from readers like you to help us report accurate, timely and impactful stories for the Pittsburgh region — available to everyone without paywalls.
Everyone deserves access to credible information to understand and help shape the region they call home, which is why we work hard everyday to deliver fact-checked stories on education, environment, health, local government and more.
You may republish this Pittsburgh's Public Source story in full online or in print under the conditions stated below. You may also choose to republish the first 12 paragraphs with imagery and link to PublicSource for the full story.
All you need to do is copy the HTML code we provide on this page and paste it into your CMS. We strongly encourage you to copy the code and paste it directly into a code editor. In Wordpress, press the three dots in the upper right of the Post and choose Code editor. That should give you the story text, along with photos from the body of the article.
Here are your obligations under our republishing guidelines:
Give us credit, in this format: “by [Author Name(s)], Pittsburgh's Public Source”.
Include a line at the top of the story that reads: “Pittsburgh's Public Source is an independent nonprofit newsroom serving the Pittsburgh region. Sign up for our free newsletters.”
In the html code of the page, include a line of javascript that helps us keep track of hits. It’s already in the code below.
Let us know when you use our work by sending an email to natasha@publicsource.org.
By republishing our story, you agree to the following conditions:
You can’t edit, cut or alter the story, except to suit your in-house style (e.g. % vs. “percent,” honorifics, etc).
You must not resell the story or sell ads against the story. It’s fine to publish the story on a page that’s surrounded by previously sold ads, however.
Please exclude our work from being published or syndicated to third-party platforms or apps like Newsbreak under your publication name, when possible
If you share the story or a link to the story on social media, please tag us on Twitter (@publicsourcepa), Instagram (@publicsource), Facebook (@publicsource) or TikTok (@publicsource).
We reserve the right to deny, revoke or limit the rights conveyed herein for any reason, including (but not limited to) instances in which these conditions are not met or the reproduced material is not presented in a responsible manner.
How anti-SNAP rhetoric is doing real damage
by Guest commentary by Kelly Wild and Heather Seiders, Pittsburgh's Public Source August 21, 2026
Get Pittsburgh accountability journalism in your inbox.
How anti-SNAP rhetoric is doing real damage
Share this:
Hunger does not happen in a vacuum. It is built, policy by policy, narrative by narrative, into a country that has turned the simple act of feeding your family into something to be ashamed of.
For decades, opponents of SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have shaped public discourse around who “deserves” help and who is “gaming the system.” That framing costs people access to life-saving food. Fear of judgment leads eligible people to delay or abandon their applications entirely. Deliberate confusion about who qualifies (be it immigrants, college students or working adults) keeps people in the dark about benefits they have every right to access.
According to the Food Resource and Action Center, since Congress passed the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” in July 2025, over 5 million individuals have lost access to SNAP. In Allegheny County alone, enrollment fell by 19,000, with many of those likely tied to new work requirements and additional paperwork hurdles buried in the bill. These are veterans, older adults, people with disabilities, your neighbors, your coworkers, your relatives, all losing their most effective defense against hunger.
Defenders of these cuts call the program bloated, say it breeds dependency, insist it needs to be reined in. Ignoring the data, they strategically flatten SNAP recipients into a single category, rather than recognizing a large, diverse group of people navigating poverty in an economy where food prices surged 23.5% between 2020 and 2023, where a full-time job no longer guarantees food security, and where 74% of SNAP households in Pennsylvania include at least one working adult.
This rhetoric also upholds a history of systemic racial inequality, which it continues to feed to this day. In Pennsylvania in 2024, Black residents experienced food insecurity at nearly three times the rate of white residents, 27% compared to 10%, and Hispanic and Latino residents face rates nearly as stark. Research from Johns Hopkins confirms that SNAP meaningfully narrows the gap in food insecurity between participating Black and white households. To cut SNAP is to exacerbate these disparities, and this is not accidental. The communities hit hardest are the same ones that have been the target of racist policy and rhetoric for generations.
Meanwhile, bureaucratic dysfunction provides convenient camouflage for what is a political choice. Nearly half of SNAP participants in Pennsylvania report not receiving paperwork with enough time to meet deadlines; three in 10 struggle to reach a caseworker by phone; and many face wait times of an hour or more just to speak with someone. Thousands of accounts are closed every month because the system is chronically understaffed and overwhelmed.
The fixes are not complicated.
These are not radical demands. They are the baseline for a functioning program.
What stands between those fixes and reality is not a lack of solutions. It is a lack of political will, built on policy designed to judge whether people have earned the right to eat.
We can and should debate budget math and administrative bottlenecks, but we must be honest about what’s driving this moment. Hunger isn’t an accident of policy failure. For too many in power, it’s the intended result. Until we say that plainly, and demand better with real urgency, the cuts will keep coming and the food bank lines will keep growing.
Kellie Wild is executive director of the Pittsburgh Food Policy Council and can be reached at kellliew@pittsburghfoodpolicy.org. The Pittsburgh Food Policy Council is a nonprofit organization that mobilizes people through listening, educating and advocating for policies and programs that shift power, expand access to resources and strengthen the Greater Pittsburgh food system.
Heather Seiders is executive director of Just Harvest and can be reached at heathers@justharvest.org. Just Harvest is a nonprofit organization dedicated to addressing hunger and economic injustice in the Greater Pittsburgh region.
MORE STORIES
Help us continue telling stories like this one.
We’re Pittsburgh’s Public Source, an independent, nonprofit newsroom. That means we rely on donations from readers like you to help us report accurate, timely and impactful stories for the Pittsburgh region — available to everyone without paywalls.
Everyone deserves access to credible information to understand and help shape the region they call home, which is why we work hard everyday to deliver fact-checked stories on education, environment, health, local government and more.
We've seen our journalism prompt widespread change in the Pittsburgh region — but none of it would be possible without the support of our community. If you found this story valuable, consider "paying it forward" by making a gift today.
MOST READ STORIES