Tomorrow, Allegheny County Executive Sara Innamorato is expected to sign a just-passed paid parental leave ordinance.

Today, many Allegheny County businesses may be mulling how to comply with the ordinance, effective a year from now, which mandates that they provide the benefit at their expense.

Based on testimony ahead of council’s 11-4 vote, households planning to start or expand a family could well be considering their timing.

Council members were already predicting that there would be glitches, which they may need to clean up through further legislation.

Statements issued since the vote suggest that business community opposition may not be over. It’s unclear whether foes will turn to the courts in an effort to stop or delay the mandates.

What led to the historic vote? Let’s rewind through Pittsburgh’s Public Source’s coverage of the process by which the county embarked on the nation’s first local-level paid parental leave ordinance.

Tuesday night’s vote followed revisions by the county Board of Health.

The changes followed an unprecedented flood of written comments from parents, advocates, healthcare professionals and business owners — the latter typically concerned about cost and administrative burden. Comments in favor outnumbered opponents 2-to-1.

Deep concern from the influential business community did not seem to deter Innamorato who has championed the proposal as her own approaching motherhood made news.

Early in its evolution, the proposal’s novelty put it on the radar of national public health and economics experts, some of whom shared insights with Public Source.

The battle lines that were still evident Tuesday night were evident early in the debate, as public hearings saw a deluge of public support while representatives of the business community grappled with how to voice concern without sounding anti-parent.

The amended ordinance reflects compromises, including exemption of the smallest employers, reduction in the duration of the benefit and a requirement that workers have meaningful tenure before taking leave. It doesn’t back off, though, on the key goals of the original proposal.

Rich Lord is the managing editor at Pittsburgh’s Public Source and can be reached at rich@publicsource.org.

Help us continue telling stories like this one.

We’re Pittsburgh’s Public Source, an independent, nonprofit newsroom. That means we rely on donations from readers like you to help us report accurate, timely and impactful stories for the Pittsburgh region — available to everyone without paywalls.

Everyone deserves access to credible information to understand and help shape the region they call home, which is why we work hard everyday to deliver fact-checked stories on education, environment, health, local government and more.

We've seen our journalism prompt widespread change in the Pittsburgh region — but none of it would be possible without the support of our community. If you found this story valuable, consider "paying it forward" by making a gift today.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Rich is the managing editor of Pittsburgh's Public Source. He joined the team in 2020, serving as a reporter focused on housing and economic development and an assistant editor. He reported for the Pittsburgh...