People who can’t work because of a disability are eligible for benefits from the federal government, but the Washington Post has found a huge backlog in disability appeals cases.

The wait for decisions has resulted in years of frustration for applicants who have already submitted piles of paperwork, endured additional medical exams and then have to testify in court that they are disabled enough to qualify for benefits. And, all that while, they are often forced to get by on little to no income.

The Social Security office of judges who hear appeals for disability benefits is 990,399 cases behind.

That is Washington’s backlog of backlogs — a queue of waiting Americans larger than the populations of six different states. It is bigger even than the infamous backups at Veterans Affairs, where 526,000 people are waiting in line, and the patent office, where 606,000 applications are pending.

Much of the delay is because the judges are charged with figuring out who is a fraud.

There is a common belief that many people who get disability benefits are just too lazy to work. In some cases, it’s been true, and that’s why they are vetted so meticulously.

The judge is supposed to read the applicant’s medical records and ask questions about medications, limitations and levels of pain. There are 1,445 of these Social Security judges, which means its in-house legal system is larger than the entire regular federal court system — district and appeals courts and the Supreme Court put together.

When they make a ruling, they must decide whether someone is truly unable to hold any job.

The average case takes 422 days to decide, according to the story.

Social Security officials told the Post that the backlog was also caused by an increase in applications for disability benefits because of aging baby boomers and people who lost their jobs in the recession.

The experience of fighting this backlog can feel desperate and futile to people on both sides of the judge’s bench.

“I had two claimants on my docket this past month. . . . They died. They died. Waiting for a hearing,” said Carol Pennock, a Social Security judge based in Miami. “I really wonder if what we’re doing is effective at all. If it helps at all. If, based on the amount of evidence we get, my decision is any better than flipping a coin.”

Reach Halle Stockton at 412-315-0263 or hstockton@publicsource.org. Follow her on Twitter @HalleStockton.

This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.

James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.

It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?

Halle has served as managing editor for PublicSource since 2015, leading the newsroom and its editorial strategy. Prior to this role, Halle was a reporter for PublicSource for three years and for the Sarasota...