A variety of positive and negative aspects of Pennsylvania’s lobbying disclosure law netted out to a ‘C’ grade for the state in a recent study of lobbying disclosure in all 50 states by the Sunlight Foundation.
Pennsylvania lost points because lobbyists in the state do not have to reveal which pieces of legislation they tried to influence and lobbyists don’t have to report itemized lobbying expenses if they total less than $2,500 in a quarter.
But, the state received good marks for requiring lobbyists to itemize expenses in quarters above the $2,500 threshold and for requiring lobbyists to put expenses into categories such as food or travel. Pennsylvania also received a point for putting its lobbying registration and expenditure reports online.
From the story:
“…many states fail to address the legislative flaws that create unfortunate loopholes, do not provide citizens with easily accessible information and navigable websites, and lack stringent transparency policies.”
Seven states received an ‘A’ from the foundation: California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina and Wisconsin.
In New Jersey, lobbyists must disclose conflicts of interest, such as whether they ever served in a variety of political positions, including independent authorities and municipal utilities.
Four states received an ‘F’ — Florida, Nevada, Oregon and West Virginia. Florida received the lowest possible score on the foundation’s grading scale because lobbyists there don’t report their expenses, what legislation they are trying to influence and the public can’t access lobbying disclosures or expenses online.
You can see the full scorecard here.
From the story:
Regardless of the legal language, if the state agency overseeing lobbying offers a clunky website, then finding the disclosed information becomes a real hassle. Kansas chooses not to hold any lobbying data before 2015 on its website. Further, the data presented are not machine-readable nor downloadable in bulk — a criticism applicable to many states.
This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.
James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.
It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?