People march from Mellon Square to UPMC’s Downtown headquarters during a Die In + Funeral to Protect Trans Youth in protest of decisions to end gender-affirming care for transgender people under 19, Monday, Sept. 8, 2025. (Public Source photo illustration. Original photo by Stephanie Strasburg/Pittsburgh's Public Source)
There are no medical providers in Pittsburgh openly offering gender-affirming care to individuals under 19, in a shift since President Donald Trump directed federal agencies to withhold funding early last year. Legal advocates argue the underlying executive order is unlawful and discriminatory, yet many institutions have preemptively complied. This compliance overrides the autonomy of parents and keeps healthcare providers from following best practices. In Pittsburgh, we need institutions to practice courageous advocacy.
The issue is about more than federal accounting; for some it could be a matter of life and death. Transgender youth experience higher rates of depression and suicidality than cisgender peers. Gender-affirming care, meanwhile, can improve well-being. In one study, puberty blockers or hormone therapy were associated with 60% lower odds of depression and 73% lower odds of suicidality for transgender youth. Another study followed 55 transgender people over several years of gender-affirming care, and found they reported relief from gender dysphoria and similar or improved well-being compared to cisgender peers.
Most bills proposing gender-affirming care bans cite concerns about detransition and regret, given the potentially lasting effects on health and fertility. However, data on detransition rates are limited, with small sample sizes and inconsistent definitions of detransition. Reasons for detransition also add important context. A study of over 17,000 transgender adults found a detransition rate of 13%. Of those, 83% reported external reasons for detransitioning, including social stigma. Medical interventions such as puberty blockers are time sensitive, and young transgender people are often desperate to avoid the development of secondary sex characteristics misaligned with their gender identity.
The public is not invested in banning care for transgender youth. A nationally representative survey found the majority opposed denying care to transgender people. In a survey about gender-affirming surgery, 80% of respondents believed that being transgender was a natural occurrence, just below the 85% who supported the right to surgery for adults and 62% who supported it for children. Parents of transgender youth have called for lawmakers to accept that transgender youth health is not a political issue.
Medical systems should follow brave examples by speaking out in support of transgender patients. When providers challenge executive orders in court, they slow enforcement, buying valuable time for families scrambling to meet their children’s health care needs. Medical systems should also empower staff to speak out by designating time for clinicians to pursue advocacy and public education on transgender issues. Institutional legal counsel should stay informed about the changing legislative landscape and assist clinicians and hospital staff in interpreting treatment implications. Medical associations and societies should continue to engage in media advocacy for providers’ autonomy in following evidence-based best practice.
Not all local organizations and providers are silently backing down. TransYOUniting and ACT UP Pittsburgh are organizing and assembling, with protests such as a “die in and funeral event to protect trans youth” staged outside UPMC’s headquarters to call out its compliance with Trump’s order. More than 100 UPMC employees signed an open letter urging the organization to resume all gender-affirming services. At the national level, several major health care organizations made statements recognizing gender-affirming treatment as medically necessary. A coalition including the ACLU and PFLAG and a group of 16 states and the District of Columbia are each suing the Trump administration.
In some states, providers face loss of licensure or felony charges for providing gender-affirming care for transgender youth. This is not yet the case in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh’s medical systems should exercise bravery by supporting their staff and patients and resisting unconstitutional bans while they still can.
Ansel Bloom is a first year student at Point Park University’s Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program and can be reached at ansel.bloom@pointpark.edu.
RELATED STORIES
This story was made possible by donations to our independent, nonprofit newsroom.
Can you help us keep going with a gift?
We’re Pittsburgh’s Public Source. Since 2011, we’ve taken pride in serving our community by delivering accurate, timely, and impactful journalism — without paywalls. We believe that everyone deserves access to information about local decisions and events that affect them.
But it takes a lot of resources to produce this reporting, from compensating our staff, to the technology that brings it to you, to fact-checking every line, and much more. Reader support is crucial to our ability to keep doing this work.
If you learned something new from this story, consider supporting us with a donation today. Your donation helps ensure that everyone in Allegheny County can stay informed about issues that impact their lives. Thank you for your support!
You may republish this Pittsburgh's Public Source story in full online or in print under the conditions stated below. You may also choose to republish the first 12 paragraphs with imagery and link to PublicSource for the full story.
All you need to do is copy the HTML code we provide on this page and paste it into your CMS. We strongly encourage you to copy the code and paste it directly into a code editor. In Wordpress, press the three dots in the upper right of the Post and choose Code editor. That should give you the story text, along with photos from the body of the article.
Here are your obligations under our republishing guidelines:
Give us credit, in this format: “by [Author Name(s)], Pittsburgh's Public Source”.
Include a line at the top of the story that reads: “Pittsburgh's Public Source is an independent nonprofit newsroom serving the Pittsburgh region. Sign up for our free newsletters.”
In the html code of the page, include a line of javascript that helps us keep track of hits. It’s already in the code below.
Let us know when you use our work by sending an email to ds@publicsource.org.
By republishing our story, you agree to the following conditions:
You can’t edit, cut or alter the story, except to suit your in-house style (e.g. % vs. “percent,” honorifics, etc).
You must not resell the story or sell ads against the story. It’s fine to publish the story on a page that’s surrounded by previously sold ads, however.
Please exclude our work from being published or syndicated to third-party platforms or apps like Newsbreak under your publication name, when possible
If you share the story or a link to the story on social media, please tag us on Twitter (@publicsourcepa), Instagram (@publicsource), Facebook (@publicsource) or TikTok (@publicsource).
We reserve the right to deny, revoke or limit the rights conveyed herein for any reason, including (but not limited to) instances in which these conditions are not met or the reproduced material is not presented in a responsible manner.
We need brave institutions to support transgender youth in Pittsburgh
by Guest commentary by Ansel Bloom, Pittsburgh's Public Source February 13, 2026
We need brave institutions to support transgender youth in Pittsburgh
Share this:
There are no medical providers in Pittsburgh openly offering gender-affirming care to individuals under 19, in a shift since President Donald Trump directed federal agencies to withhold funding early last year. Legal advocates argue the underlying executive order is unlawful and discriminatory, yet many institutions have preemptively complied. This compliance overrides the autonomy of parents and keeps healthcare providers from following best practices. In Pittsburgh, we need institutions to practice courageous advocacy.
The issue is about more than federal accounting; for some it could be a matter of life and death. Transgender youth experience higher rates of depression and suicidality than cisgender peers. Gender-affirming care, meanwhile, can improve well-being. In one study, puberty blockers or hormone therapy were associated with 60% lower odds of depression and 73% lower odds of suicidality for transgender youth. Another study followed 55 transgender people over several years of gender-affirming care, and found they reported relief from gender dysphoria and similar or improved well-being compared to cisgender peers.
Most bills proposing gender-affirming care bans cite concerns about detransition and regret, given the potentially lasting effects on health and fertility. However, data on detransition rates are limited, with small sample sizes and inconsistent definitions of detransition. Reasons for detransition also add important context. A study of over 17,000 transgender adults found a detransition rate of 13%. Of those, 83% reported external reasons for detransitioning, including social stigma. Medical interventions such as puberty blockers are time sensitive, and young transgender people are often desperate to avoid the development of secondary sex characteristics misaligned with their gender identity.
The public is not invested in banning care for transgender youth. A nationally representative survey found the majority opposed denying care to transgender people. In a survey about gender-affirming surgery, 80% of respondents believed that being transgender was a natural occurrence, just below the 85% who supported the right to surgery for adults and 62% who supported it for children. Parents of transgender youth have called for lawmakers to accept that transgender youth health is not a political issue.
Medical systems should follow brave examples by speaking out in support of transgender patients. When providers challenge executive orders in court, they slow enforcement, buying valuable time for families scrambling to meet their children’s health care needs. Medical systems should also empower staff to speak out by designating time for clinicians to pursue advocacy and public education on transgender issues. Institutional legal counsel should stay informed about the changing legislative landscape and assist clinicians and hospital staff in interpreting treatment implications. Medical associations and societies should continue to engage in media advocacy for providers’ autonomy in following evidence-based best practice.
Not all local organizations and providers are silently backing down. TransYOUniting and ACT UP Pittsburgh are organizing and assembling, with protests such as a “die in and funeral event to protect trans youth” staged outside UPMC’s headquarters to call out its compliance with Trump’s order. More than 100 UPMC employees signed an open letter urging the organization to resume all gender-affirming services. At the national level, several major health care organizations made statements recognizing gender-affirming treatment as medically necessary. A coalition including the ACLU and PFLAG and a group of 16 states and the District of Columbia are each suing the Trump administration.
In some states, providers face loss of licensure or felony charges for providing gender-affirming care for transgender youth. This is not yet the case in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh’s medical systems should exercise bravery by supporting their staff and patients and resisting unconstitutional bans while they still can.
Ansel Bloom is a first year student at Point Park University’s Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program and can be reached at ansel.bloom@pointpark.edu.
RELATED STORIES
This story was made possible by donations to our independent, nonprofit newsroom.
Can you help us keep going with a gift?
We’re Pittsburgh’s Public Source. Since 2011, we’ve taken pride in serving our community by delivering accurate, timely, and impactful journalism — without paywalls. We believe that everyone deserves access to information about local decisions and events that affect them.
But it takes a lot of resources to produce this reporting, from compensating our staff, to the technology that brings it to you, to fact-checking every line, and much more. Reader support is crucial to our ability to keep doing this work.
If you learned something new from this story, consider supporting us with a donation today. Your donation helps ensure that everyone in Allegheny County can stay informed about issues that impact their lives. Thank you for your support!
MOST READ STORIES