Pittsburgh’s expected purchase of 660 acres of land could create one of the region’s largest parks and end a saga of potential development on one of Pittsburgh’s largest untouched tracts of land.

The property consists of 642 acres in the city’s Hays neighborhood, which is west of Homestead along the southern side of the Monongahela River, and 18 acres in Baldwin Borough. The new park could rival Frick Park, the city’s largest park at 644 acres.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority’s board is expected to approve the $5 million purchase of the land, and its mineral rights, from The Pittsburgh Development Group II, principally owned by Beaver County developer Charles Betters, in a meeting Thursday afternoon.

The undeveloped area, known as Hays Woods, has several hiking and biking trails, streams, valleys and a waterfall. Recently, the area has become better known for the bald eagles that roost in the woods and can be watched online.

The sale was classified as a “gift” in the city’s press release as it’s being deemed a “bargain sale” because the value of the property, the city said, is far more than $5 million. The city said the development group had invested more than $15 million in the site.

“This is a historic day for Pittsburgh, one that allows us to make a monumental addition to our urban forests and hillsides, and one that harkens back to other great gifts of parkland in our City’s past,” Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto said in a press release. “What a thrilling present for our 200th birthday.”

The city also said in its press release that a small portion of the land could support a housing development, and it is unclear when the park could open to visitors.

The purchase of this land appears to end the long and tenuous development future of this property.

The area, at one time, was supposed to be called Pittsburgh Palisades Park, which was centered around a thoroughbred racetrack and gambling facility. There was also a planned town center and residential neighborhood, according to these preliminary 2003 plans.

The initial plan was to strip mine most of the area and then fill in the land before building. That drew the ire of neighbors, environmental groups and several regulators, including the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. The strip mining plan was first rejected in December 2006 and then again on appeal in 2009.

The Pittsburgh Development Group II purchased the land in 2003 for $1 million, according to the Allegheny County Real Estate Assessment website. Before that, it was owned by DGD Realty Associates, which bought the property in 1989 for about $2.7 million.

“DGD Realty Associates, of Putnam County, N.Y., bought the 635 acres of wooded slopes from bankrupt LTV Steel in 1989, hoping to build more than 700 homes,” according to a 2003 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story. Much like the Palisades Park proposal, DGD’s residential development plan never happened either.

Reach Eric Holmberg at 412-515-0064 or at eholmberg@publicsource.org. Follow him on Twitter @holmberges.

This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.

James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.

It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?