A Social Security inspector general’s report uncovered an estimated $2 billion in inappropriate disability benefit payouts over seven years.
According to the Associated Press report, about 25,000 people who should not have qualified for disability benefits were rubber-stamped by a group of Social Security judges who have been approving claims at rates higher than their colleagues.
Those mistakes will cost taxpayers a projected $300 million next year.
“These results demonstrate the fact that our greatest concerns have been true for years,” said Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla., a member of the House Oversight Committee. “[The Social Security Administration] has allowed [administrative law judges] to carry large caseloads and has encouraged quantity over quality.”
According to the AP, the inspector general’s report states that the Social Security has taken measures to reduce improper claims. It has increased oversight of judges who are approving claims at high rates, and the agency has disciplined 14 of the 44 judges involved in this recent investigation.
The Center for Economic and Policy Research issued a response to the AP story, blasting the national news agency for not providing context to the inspector general report.
The piece neglected to mention that the program paid out close to $900 billion in benefits over that [seven-year] period. This means that improper payments identified in the inspector general’s report were less than 0.3 percent of the total payments in the program.
Since the piece does not provide any context it is likely that many people will be led to believe that the disability program is rife with fraud when in fact the report is indicating the opposite. It would be great if improper payments were zero, but in a program that pays out $140 billion in benefits every year, this is not going to happen.
According to the center’s statement, the AP’s characterization of the inspector general’s findings could lead to people being wrongly denied disability benefits.
This fact-based local reporting drives impact and creates change. Help power that impact.
James Baldwin wrote, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” PublicSource exists to help the Pittsburgh region face its realities and create opportunities for change. When we shine a light on inequity in our region, like the “completely unacceptable” conditions in low-income housing in McKeesport, things change. When we ask questions about policymakers’ decisions, like how Allegheny County is handling COVID-19 safety for its employees, things change. When we push for transparency on issues that affect the public, like in the use of facial recognition software by Pittsburgh police, things change.
It takes a lot of time, skill and resources to produce journalism like this. Our stories are always made available for free so that they can benefit the most people, regardless of ability to pay. But as an independent, nonprofit newsroom, we count on donations from our readers to support this crucial work. Can you make a contribution of any amount (or better yet, set up a recurring monthly gift) to help ensure we can continue to report on what matters and tell stories for a better Pittsburgh?